Skip to content

We Are the Weirdos, Mister: Power, Rage, and Teenage Witches

9
Share

We Are the Weirdos, Mister: Power, Rage, and Teenage Witches

Home / We Are the Weirdos, Mister: Power, Rage, and Teenage Witches
Books Witches

We Are the Weirdos, Mister: Power, Rage, and Teenage Witches

By

Published on October 23, 2019

Screenshot: Columbia Pictures
9
Share
Nancy in The Craft (1996)
Screenshot: Columbia Pictures

Consider the teenage witch. At least, consider the teenage witch as she existed in popular culture at the time I, personally, was a teenager: from 1993 to 1999. The ’90s, in retrospect, was a very particular decade to be a teenage girl. Alanis was on the radio. We had Juliana Hatfield, the Cranberries, Missy Elliott, Shirley Manson, Lauryn Hill, Kim Deal and the Breeders—voices that told their own stories, who joked and cried and soared and screamed and roared. Riot Grrrls. Lilith Fair. Tori freaking Amos. These women formed a coven of sound, a shared promise that what we had to say had value, what we felt was real.

But let’s turn now to the scripted witches.

[Note: this article contains references to depression and self-harm as depicted in The Craft]

We had Sabrina (the Teenage Witch) Spellman: born of Archie Comics, brought to life in charming, daffy half-hour sitcom form. The Salem the cat gifs from Sabrina remain the gifs that keep on giving, but I preferred Melissa Joan Hart in her previous incarnation. Clarissa Explained It All, and never had to do-over her days to cover up the evidence of her growing power. Clarissa made mistakes–she wasn’t superhuman–but she was allowed to be the expert about her own experience, the voice of wisdom in a world of fools and Ferg-faces.

We had Willow Rosenberg, Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s adorably awkward friend, whose aptitude for academics and technology (“I’m so the Net girl”) led naturally to experimentation with witchcraft, the discovery of all the shades of her sexuality and innate power. She got—to the magic, at least—addicted, in one of Joss Whedon’s meh-iest high-school-is-a-horror-movie metaphors. Her equally adorable girlfriend Tara was shot and killed, and then Willow Went Bad. I didn’t mind Willow’s turn to the Dark in theory—Vampire Willow was always a kick—though Tara’s death was a wearying trope then, and an exhausting one now.

And we had Nancy, Bonnie, Rochelle, and Sarah, calling on the four corners, invoking the spirit and the perils of female friendship in The Craft. I only saw The Craft as an adult, but, being the target demo, I was certainly aware of its existence in 1996. It was pitched as a horror movie and I wasn’t in love with horror yet—though that love would develop within the year, when Scream came out on video. Neve Campbell stars in both, as quiet, scarred Bonnie in The Craft, and postmodern final girl Sydney Prescott in Scream, making her a kind of mid-90s locus for representations of supernormal female power on screen: she was both a literal witch, and the girl who survived the slasher despite not being a virgin.

The Craft is a smorgasbord of proto-Hot Topic nostalgia—the knee socks! The chokers! That soundtrack! Which could certainly be purchased from the BMG Music Club!—and while I find things about it entertaining and admirable, it’s never truly satisfying. Sarah (Robin Tunney) is the new girl at her Los Angeles parochial school. Her mother died in childbirth; she struggles with depression and has previously attempted suicide, with the scars (“You even did it the right way!” Bonnie gasps) on her wrists to prove it. On her first day of school, she receives two forms of unsolicited attention: from jock Skeet Ulrich (I know his character has a name but he is never not Skeet), and a trio of girls. Led by the magnetic Nancy (Fairuza Balk, blessed be), they warn her—in a perfect dramatization of how gossip and rumors about powerful men tend to be the first line of defense for women—that Skeet only wants one thing. Nancy speaks from experience. The girls adopt Sarah, suspecting that she’s to be their coven’s fourth.

They’re right. Or at least, they’re right that Sarah has a kind of power that even she doesn’t understand, and together they’ll be capable of achieving things they’ve only dreamed. Sarah casts a love spell for Skeet to notice her, even though he has been a patent asshole. Rochelle (Rachel True), the only African-American we really see at their school, wishes to “not hate those who hate her,” meaning her racist blonde bully (Christine Taylor). Bonnie, scarred from a fire, wishes to be beautiful inside and out. Nancy’s true desire is not clearly articulated (“I think she wanted to not be white trash anymore, or something,” Rochelle later translates for Sarah), but her abusive stepfather croaks, and his life insurance policy is a six-figure windfall for Nancy and her mother. This blush of success has the girls seeking more power, and invoking the spirit Manon on a midnight beach. Nancy gets struck by lightning. Dead sharks wash ashore the next morning. Something wicked is no longer coming this way; it is here.

The Craft, alas, is not the finest piece of filmmaking. I appreciate that it tries to give all four of its witches an arc, but those arcs end up feeling undercooked. Bonnie, her flesh renewed, becomes “narcissistic,” but all we ever really see is her being confident, showing her body, cat-calling a man (how dare she!). The girl who bullied Rochelle for her “nappy hair” loses all her hair, and Rochelle, seeing her antagonist pathetically reduced—feels guilty? She doesn’t get to verbalize her response. And Nancy, poor, misused, and underestimated Nancy, comes into incredible power, and goes mad and bad, first killing Skeet in an act of vengeance, and then terrorizing Sarah, who she was supposedly avenging. Bonnie and Rochelle become Nancy’s lackeys. We’ve been told that there is neither black nor white magic, only what’s in the heart of the witch, but the movie isn’t well written enough to sell Nancy’s black-magic heart. Or maybe I, almost forty, living in 2019, can no longer look at a teenage girl who’s known pain and now has agency, and find it anything more than tragic—and a conformist narrative of patriarchal control—to see her turn that power back on herself and her sisters.

***

I did not love these witches—at least, not for being witches—when I was a teenager. Now I see why: they were representations of female power, which I did crave, but they were also stories of that power going awry, cautionary tales about having the gall to think you could wield power without being punished. Which isn’t, in theory, a bad story; too much power of any kind can be seductive and destructive. But there are only a few stock characters in pop culture that are gendered female; other than witches, I can only think of fairies. Witchcraft, then, is the primary form of supernatural power women can be imagined to innately wield, and the primary stories we are told about witches are about hiding. Danger. Punishment. It’s what Linda Holmes called the scarcity problem; when there are so few stories that feature women, that are about women, there is tremendous pressure for every single one to mean something.

The scenes in The Craft where the girls are first reveling in their abilities—walking four-abreast to Letters to Cleo’s “Dangerous Type,” levitating Rochelle using sleepover classic Light as a Feather, Stiff as a Board—are delightful. The actors have great chemistry; the girls they’re portraying are building friendships by proximity, as so many girls do in small, claustrophobic high schools. It’s always clear what they have most in common (besides their natural gifts, i.e., shared femininity) is that they’re on the fringes of their high school society, and they’ve banded together for safety.

But the very agency they seek for themselves, the spells they cast, threatens that safety. Sarah’s love spell on Skeet makes him obsessed to the point where he attempts to assault her. Nancy, when she hears of this, ends up killing Skeet in vengeance, setting the stage for the final confrontation—which is between the four girls, not against the world. Sarah tries to bind Nancy from doing more harm; Nancy gets pissed, and descends on Sarah’s house with Bonnie and Rochelle to enact punishment for Sarah’s attempt to control her. The root of this final plot mechanic, though—the metaphorical implication that Sarah’s actions made a boy unable to control himself—is misogynist bullshit of the first order.

In the end, Bonnie and Rochelle are rendered powerless. Nancy is institutionalized. Sarah, ultimately, gets to keep her powers—which equal Nancy’s but are not destructive—which is not nothing, though it implies that power, among women, can only belong to the strongest or the craziest. If I had seen this movie as a teenager, I’m not sure how I would have read it; what it would have led me to internalize. I can look at Clueless and Heathers, movies I adored at that time, and see how they honed my understanding of communities, insiders and outsiders; and gave me a taste for referential meta playfulness, satirical darkness, razor-wire wit, and always, always, inventive language to describe the world and the self.

But it’s entirely possible I would have seen The Craft and thought that Nancy got what she deserved, punishment for the crime of wanting too much. It wasn’t until I saw The Force Awakens at the ripe age of 35 that I realized I could want more, that a female hero on a global scale wasn’t too much to want. All the other outsider genre heroes of the ’90s and ’00s–the Buffys, the Sydney Bristows, the Veronica Marses– were moving us closer and closer to the center (of, admittedly, global capitalistic media, but still), to Star Wars and to Rey (who is definitely a witch!). But back in 1996, I would have idolized Nancy’s punk spit-in-your-eye spirit, her defiance—to the bus driver who warns her and her coven to watch out for weirdoes—that “we are the weirdoes, mister.” To see her punished, strapped to a bed and howling, I think would have felt like a betrayal. The story of The Craft was a slap on the wrist. It wasn’t even cathartic.

Carrie, now—Carrie White’s telekinetic prom night rage was deeply, deeply cathartic.

Carrie movie car flip scene
Screenshot: MGM

In order to find teenage witches that spoke to me as a teenager, I had to broaden the popular definition of a witch. If we posit that the society makes the witch—i.e., a witch is anyone deemed relatively unnatural or unruly, whose very existence threatens some key (yet arbitrary) paradigm by which a society keeps control over its population—than anyone on the outside, peaked hat or no, can be a witch. I was a witch—smart, tall, not in the least interested in being less or other than I was to attract attention or approval, from boys or girls.

And Carrie White, friendless, strange—pubescent, telekinetic and alone—is a witch. She’s also a monster, and Carrie is a monster movie (and horror novel) of a very unique breed, one that creates enormous affection for its protagonist, who’s both hero and villain, victim and murderer, arouser of empathy and disgust. Abused and tormented by her fanatic mother, her classmates in general, and Chris, one very, very mean girl in particular, she’s invited to the prom by a kind boy, on his also kind, if not totally innocent, girlfriend Sue’s insistence. You know the rest: Mean Girl Chris pours a bucket of pig’s blood on Carrie after she’s crowned prom queen.

The twists and turns of blame and vengeance, anger and resentment, that drive the plot of Carrie are classic teenage psychology, and the film does an excellent job developing them. Carrie gets her period during gym class and doesn’t know what it is; the other girls, including Chris and Sue, tease her by chanting and pelting her with sanitary pads; Chris gets her prom tickets revoked because she refuses to go to detention…and of course, in Chris’s mind, this is entirely Carrie’s fault. Because Carrie didn’t know how to Be A Girl, and it was only natural for Chris and the other Real Girls to torment her for her ignorance. And now Chris, the Queen Bee, feels justified in burning Carrie at the stake for the insult.

But Carrie knows how to burn back. Her telekinetic response to Chris’s violent humiliation—the metal blood bucket falls and kills sweet Tommy, her date; the nervous laughter of the crowd confirms Carrie’s mother’s threat that “they’re all gonna laugh at you”—is extreme. She opens the sprinklers, starts an electrical fire, releases herself but traps everyone inside the gym and lets that mother burn to the ground. In the novel, she cuts a swath of destruction across town before gently inducing a heart attack in her mother. In the film, her mother stabs her in the back, after which Carrie crucifies her in a scene that, when I saw it in the middle of the night after my senior prom, was one of the most shocking and extraordinary things I had ever seen. It is an ecstasy of suffering. Which is what it feels like, much of the time, to be a teenage girl.

Nancy’s tragedy in The Craft is underwhelming and chastening; Carrie’s tragedy is a full bloom of unavoidable wreckage, a story of innocent, misunderstood potential gone apocalyptic. Hurt people, as Hustlers so recently reminded us, hurt people. I’m not saying that I wanted to burn my high school to the ground, but I am saying that I recognized how Carrie felt.

***

Carrie, though it may have represented a form of female pain and power that felt true and cathartic, is still a tragedy: Carrie dies for her sins (and the sins of so many others). But the film doesn’t lay the blame on her alone, or punish her for her pretensions to self-actualized power; she is a victim, too, and the film—voluptuously shot and scored (those Pino Donaggio themes!)—exalts her. And mourns her, or what she could have become in a kinder world.

For a teenage girl is on the cusp of becoming, her body, her mind, her very self subject to the impossible demands the world makes of girls—to fit in, but also to stand out; to be sexually available, but not a slut; to be nice, and to think of other people’s comfort and desires always at the expense of her own. It’s a rich brew of pressures that will ultimately guide her fate, over which she may have very little choice or control but by which she will be judged and known. Will she become a good witch, or a bad? Or not a witch at all?

I did not love the pop culture witches of my teenage years. But I did love what I felt, instinctively, was the world of the witch, a world The Craft touched but didn’t fully understand, that Carrie burned like a pyre. A shadow world living in parallel with our common one; a world of the possible, and the exalted other. Of mystery, old laws and truths of nature that were visible in the cards, in the stars, in the deep connections we made with one another when we were young and on the edge of knowing. A world where power takes a hundred different forms, and doesn’t always destroy. It’s a world that exists and always has, and still provides shelter for the misfits, outsiders and weirdoes—the witches—who are called to it, comforted by its promise that what we have to say has value, and what we feel is real. The world of the witch is a long, old story, whose full past and future we are only just beginning to tell.

Kate Racculia is the author of This Must Be the Place and Bellweather Rhapsody, winner of the American Library Association’s Alex Award. She received her MFA from Emerson College and works for the Bethlehem Area Public Library in Pennsylvania. Her most recent novel, Tuesday Mooney Talks to Ghosts, is available now from Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

About the Author

Kate Racculia

Author

Kate Racculia is the author of This Must Be the Place and Bellweather Rhapsody, winner of the American Library Association’s Alex Award. She received her MFA from Emerson College and works for the Bethlehem Area Public Library in Pennsylvania. Her most recent novel, Tuesday Mooney Talks to Ghosts, is available now from Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Learn More About
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
Dear Reader
5 years ago

It is telling that the author makes light of sexual harassment from one of The Craft’s protagonist (the passing “how dare she!” comment). The author would no doubt criticize this toxic behavior from a male character on film (especially if it were coded as admirable), so why not acknowledge the impact and toxicity of this from a female character, rather than writing it off? 

There is a certain seeming hypocrisy here. 

Avatar
5 years ago

I believe that the “how dare she!” is a call-out to the double standard of the day (which sadly 23 years hasn’t seemed to have balanced out so well) that saw nothing wrong with males objectifying females, but flip the script and whoa nelly!

Sadly though, The Craft was one of the best films from the time period about young women with agency over their lives and relations.  Obviously it was not an apex piece, but a building block that helped move us closer to a point where She-Ra and the Princesses of Power can exist

Avatar
5 years ago

We were teens at about the same time, and I remember loving The Craft, ha.

The main problem I have with it right now is the whole narrative around the sexual assault, which plays into the fact that ‘she made’ him do it. Yes, that is true in the story, but it obviously has some bad optics/implications.

I suppose I don’t have the same objections to Nancy’s treatment in the story even if I empathize with the point you are making here about teenage girls with agency and how they are treated in fiction.  I do see the larger point, actually, but Nancy always seemed to have kind of a nasty/mean edge (although it is VERY likely I’m viewing this through that filter since I wouldn’t have been looking at it all that critically) and so the fact that she’s finally getting agency doesn’t necessarily mean she’s right. But I do suppose you are right here about the fact that the story was crafted (no pun intended) this way in the first place and what that says about women and power.  Overall I did really enjoy this piece.

Man, was Skeet Ulrich in this AND Scream? That’s actually kind of funny. This movie also had Breckin Meyer (whom I had a huge crush on in Clueless) as one of is cronies.

Also, you mentioned Veronica Mars and I love you for that :)

 

 

Avatar
5 years ago

Wow, the Gen-Xiest of Gen-X genre movies :)

Were Nancy, Bonnie and Rochelle actual witches though?  I thought they were more fantasizing and wishing.  I haven’t seen the movie since it came out, but the way I remember it was they didn’t have any powers until Sarah shows up.  I always felt like the other girls were just borrowing Sarah’s power somehow and that’s why they lose it when she breaks with them.

Any female empowerment flew right past me at the time.  To me, it was just about be careful what you wish for, you just might get it (rather standard for stories about magic) and magical power corrupts (also rather standard).

(also, yay Veronica Mars!)

Avatar
5 years ago

I generally agree with the rather superb analysis done in this piece.

In regard to The Craft, however, it should be pointed out that Nancy is always presented as a charismatic, but very damaged person. She is the only one whose spell results directly in a death (her father-in-law’s); she is the one who kills Skeet (I can’t remember the name of his character, either, LOL); as well as the one who is ultimately pushing the others to kill Sarah.

Bonnie and Rochelle are not punished for their spells (and I liked the compassion Rochelle feels for racist über-britch Laura; it makes her a better human being than her), but for allowing themselves to side with Nancy.

: I think they all gain power with their ritual, but ultimately Sarah is the most powerful of them all, even more so when she merges with Manon, so she strips them of power in the end as punishment.

Avatar
Xavier Gerrard
5 years ago

The author pays no mind to actual Wiccan culture, or the concept of cultural appropriation in the consumerism of witch imagery and the idea that ‘anyone can be a witch’. It’s a real culture, rooted in hundreds of years of practice and persecution. Respect it like one.

Avatar
5 years ago

While I don’t judge the author for not having a background in Wicca and Neopaganism, some knowledge of those practices puts a different perspective on some of the events of “The Craft.”

(I started studying Wicca a few years after “The Craft” came out and was eventually formally initiated by a local practitioner.)

While there is very little dogma in Wicca, the “Rule of Three” is a cornerstone.  I’m not going to quote the entire “Wiccan Rede” here, but it states “An’ ye harm none, do as ye will” and warns that anything you do to others will come back upon you threefold.

From that perspective, the women in “The Craft” suffer the consequences of having done harm to others: taking away their free will (Sarah), making them bald (Rochelle) and killing (Nancy).  (I’ll admit that I’ve never quite figured out how Bonnie did harm – she only wanted to have unscarred skin and not undergo terribly painful medical therapy.  My best guess is that she did harm by being complicit with the others.)  Thus, the consequences they suffer are not necessarily a result of the ideology surrounding women’s agency, but rather the direct result of misusing their magick to harm others.

We can see this at the end when Sarah binds Nancy; she specifies in her spell that she wants to keep Nancy from doing any harm against others as well as harm against herself.  Binding spells are considered a grey area in Wicca – some Wiccans see them as doing harm – but in this case Nancy would have continued to do harm if not stopped.  I personally read her mental unwellness as having developed long before that spell as she became more and more destructive with her magick.

The scene in the New Age shop illustrates all this.  The woman who runs the shop (IIRC, she was an actual Wiccan who consulted on the film) warns the young women about misusing magick and tries to talk to them about the true practice of Wicca.  Sarah is the only one who listens; the others regularly steal from her and Nancy even steals a very dangerous magickal book she had been warned against.  

While I wished that ethical witches had a larger role in the film (I’d have liked to see a lot more of that shop-owner), Wicca has been an empowering system for a lot of young women, including me, and this was one of if not the only film at the time to try to portray it correctly.

(I’m still squicked out by the portrayal of sexual harassment and assault, however.) .

Avatar
Elisabet
5 years ago

@6 – It might be a real culture now, but Wicca was founded in the 50’s. The notion of witches predates that by a pretty significant margin, and extends well beyond Wicca’s particular take on it. There’s no reason every article on witches really needs to bring up Wicca. Also, “hundreds of centuries of persecution” – the people who died during the witch hunts were neither Wiccans, nor actually witches. 

Avatar
steve
5 years ago

@8 on the order of 50,000 ‘witches’ were put to death for practicing witchcraft in Europe.  It’s rather likely some of them did actually call themselves witches.  None of them were Wiccans though.  That is certainly true.  Reducing discussions on witchcraft to Wicca does rather limit the extremely wide range of history of witchcraft.  Which in fact is just joyfully expansive.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined